Who
doesn’t know them? Textbook exercises for practicing your grammar where you
have to find the missing word, chose the right answer or but scrambled words
together into a legitimate sentence.
From
my experience, many students have become hooked to completing such exercises.
Many smartphone apps just offer a better platform to do countless of such
exercises than a traditional textbook.
So,
what is the problem?
First,
we need to remind ourselves that the learning process is more successful, the
more it reflects the reality somebody trains for. Pilot trainees that have
access to a simulator are expected to have superior results than (hypothetically)
those that would complete exercises on paper alone. Analogously, imagine
someone wanting to become a word-class soccer player or pianist, and not
playing on an actual field or practicing on a real piano, but working on a desk
with a soccer or piano textbook. Those situations seem outrageously exaggerated
and absurd. Nobody would expect outstanding results from that.
However,
much of the language learning industry and actual practice at home is still in
that mode. What are you training for? In reality, professional and private
life, we use language mostly in audio form (speaking and listening), and our
output are sentences crafted by ourselves spontaneously, fitting a specific
situation.
Students
practicing with grammar exercises mostly do this visually, they rarely use
their own voice while completing them, and they almost never construct their
own sentences.
The
outcome of this is students spending hours over textbooks and apps, delegating
actual speech production to a minor role in their practice.
Why
is this so?
·
Exercises on paper or on a smartphone
screen create the impression of doing something “serious” and “legitimate” –
compared to just generating your own sentences;
·
It is much easier to check your answers in
those exercises, than controlling grammar in “free” speech;
·
Because millions of other language students
engage in them, you may feel that you are not alone: millions of other human
beings cannot possibly be wrong (... especially if we are oblivious to
history);
·
The publishing house or app company gives
them an aura of authority: “developed by leading language experts from the X
Institute for Y language”;
·
It offers a feeling of closure. You actually
“finish” a concrete task, experience the pleasure of completing 10 out of 10
exercises. In our day to day speech, there rarely is this feeling that we said
10 out of 10 necessary sentences in a conversation. Even in our native
language, we most often leave a conversation with the feeling we could have
said so much more, or things so much differently;
·
Especially apps offer reinforcement:
“Great. Everything was correct.” Or: “You now move to level XYZ”. As in lab
experiments with small animals where they repeat behaviors desired buy the
experimenter after being rewarded for pushing a lever in their cage, we sit
there mesmerized longing for more and more reinforcement by the app.
The same mechanisms are at work here, that make other smartphone apps and social media sites so addictive. Their goal is to keep you glued to the screen as long as possible, while you keep losing precious time to actually practicing your own speech spontaneously.
The same mechanisms are at work here, that make other smartphone apps and social media sites so addictive. Their goal is to keep you glued to the screen as long as possible, while you keep losing precious time to actually practicing your own speech spontaneously.
I
do not want to say that those exercises are entirely without merits, that, as a
byproduct, you do not learn a number of useful words and phrases. The greatest
fault is losing time to do more meaningful exercises, and to have your learning
process being directed by someone else, of studying reactively instead of
proactively.
If you like
the attitude of these articles, please check out my online courses : at the
moment, German for Russian- and Romanian-speakers, as well as on goal-setting.
If you are
interested in improving your English in the area of business presentations, I
know of no better address than Tom Antion. Please check him out following this link.
Stay tuned!
Gerhard
About the GO Method
The GO Method applies research in
psychology as well as principles of quality management to the language teaching
process. It conforms to key elements of the ISO 9001 standard, while being more
specific on teaching-related issues. Customers get access to easily adaptable
document templates.
Check us out at The GO Method.
About me
Psychologist and polyglot from Hamburg
/Germany (*1979). Married with children. MA in psychology from the University
of Hamburg. More than 15 years of experience as a university lecturer in
psychology as well as a consultant for UNICEF, Terre des Hommes, IOM, the EU
and private companies. Coordinator of the GO Method network, with
representatives in more than 90 countries worldwide.
No comments:
Post a Comment