Photo by rawpixel.com from Pexels |
It seems natural that many language learners adopt faking
as a strategy. And I am not talking about certain „tips and tricks” on how to
pass through standard language proficiency tests, with or without direct
cheating involved. In the following, we will discuss two types of faking it and
their effects on the learner and his or her surroundings.
Fake
reporting on your learning process
Almost anybody having learned a foreign language has been
asked this questions, most often even countless times: „So you have learned the
XYZ language: How much time did it take you to speak it fluently?”
We as humans are social animals, and impression
management is a universal strategy: We want to look good in the eyes of our
fellow men. Now, most people tend to fake the answer in such situations. They
will give a much lower estimate than it took them in reality. They may say, it
took them only some months, where, in reality, they pursued that language for
the last few years. The logic is simple:
the shorter the time, the more intelligent you must be. And, almost everybody
doing this, people have come to expect ridiculously low learning times when
starting a new language. When asked about my Romanian, I give, sometimes, the
answer „10 years”, I can see people wondering whether my IQ is below 75, or if
I have some other mental defects.
And, giving short times is a preemptive strategy to
excuse our mistakes. If I say „10 years”, people will think: „... and he is
still making so many mistakes”. If I say „6 months”, they will focus on all the
positive aspects, because their expectations are much lower.
The effects of this are quite bad for you as a learner.
If you start out learning sincerely, you will find yourself often in situations
where others seem to be so much smarter than you. In group settings, I have
seen it many times. „Disguised” advanced level students enroll for an
intermediate course without telling it upfront, sometimes even lying about how
long they have been learning, and leaving most other students in the course
frustrated about how „stupid” they themselves are.
If you adopt this strategy, you yourself are at risk,
because a) you may adopt unsustainable learning strategies (see below), or b)
you may avoid all situations (=practice opportunities) where your fake
expertise may be challenged, leaving you without any real chances to train
further.
Faking
through memorization
Have you ever seen one of those polyglots on Youtube
demonstrating their proficiency in 30, 40 languages by repeating one phrase in
all of those languages. It begs the questions as to how deep their knowledge
really is. Many of us just, too, memorize a limited number of phrases and
practice them to perfection.
Since
most small-talk situations start in similar ways, they may successfully fish for
compliments on their accent and language skills, in general.
The risk
here is to become dependent on that praise and to neglect learning bottom-up
how to construct one’s own sentences, instead of learning language top-down. “Fakers”
may also avoid all kind of “muddy” situations where you would need to speak
spontaneously on unpredictable topics. Of course, real learning suffers.
And, as
almost everywhere in real life, it is much better to underpromise and
overdeliver, then the other way around.
If
you like the attitude of these articles, please check out my onlinecourses : at the
moment, German for Russian- and Romanian-speakers, as well as on goal-setting.
If
you are interested in improving your English in the area of business
presentations, I know of no better address than Tom Antion. Please check him
out following this link.
Stay tuned!
Gerhard
About the GO
Method
The GO
Method applies research in psychology as well as principles of quality
management to the language teaching process. It conforms to key elements of the
ISO 9001 standard, while being more specific on teaching-related issues.
Customers get access to easily adaptable document templates.
About me
Psychologist
and polyglot from Hamburg /Germany (*1979). Married with children. MA in
psychology from the University of Hamburg. More than 15 years of experience as
a university lecturer in psychology as well as a consultant for UNICEF, Terre
des Hommes, IOM, the EU and private companies. Coordinator of the GO Method
network, with representatives in more than 90 countries worldwide.
No comments:
Post a Comment